VELUX: Shorter decision papers, better decisions
VELUX project managers were writing 20–30-page decision papers. How they learnt to put the key point first and stand their ground with senior management.
The challenge
About once a month VELUX project managers enter 'the lion's den': a stage-gate meeting where senior directors decide whether a development project goes ahead (GO), goes back for more testing (RE-CYCLE) or is stopped (KILL). Five days beforehand, the decision-makers receive a decision paper. But:
- key messages were lost in technical explanations and caveats
- the papers were often 20–30 pages – too long to be read
- the recommendations weren't tailored to the leaders' needs
- project managers didn't stand their ground when presenting
Our approach
We trained the project managers in four questions:
- How do we cut a text so the most important point for decision-makers comes first?
- How do we use earlier decisions actively in our argument?
- How do we use data and caveats as part of the argument?
- How do we answer critical questions persuasively and keep a cool head under pressure?
The result
- Shorter decision papers focused on what decision-makers need to know
- More effective stage-gate meetings with fewer attendees
- Project managers who step up: 'From project manager to project leader'
- The courage to kill weak projects – and a faster path to market for the strong ones
Presentations and meetings
The collaboration expanded with two English-language courses for VELUX staff: Present with Impact and Lead and Facilitate Effective Meetings. Both started with a self-assessment, a short webinar and pre-reading, followed by two course days with input, exercises, video recording and individual feedback – and written follow-up afterwards.
- Present with Impact: presentations that engage decision-makers, with clear messages and a credible presence.
- Lead and Facilitate Effective Meetings: why we meet, meeting roles and credibility, an effective kick-off, facilitation tools, difficult questions and virtual meetings.
- Embedding: Participants prepared an agenda for a real meeting and scheduled follow-up with a colleague and their manager, so the tools were used after the course.
Related course
Other case studies

Danish Nurses' Organisation
A shared language for decision papers across the secretariat – from the executive to staff.
Read the case study →National Social Appeals Board
Courses in appeal-meeting leadership, repeated year after year in Copenhagen and Aalborg.
Read the case study →
BankInvest
Portfolio managers and specialists who present investments and sustainability sharply to clients and partners.
Read the case study →