VELUX

VELUX: Shorter decision papers, better decisions

VELUX project managers were writing 20–30-page decision papers. How they learnt to put the key point first and stand their ground with senior management.

The challenge

About once a month VELUX project managers enter 'the lion's den': a stage-gate meeting where senior directors decide whether a development project goes ahead (GO), goes back for more testing (RE-CYCLE) or is stopped (KILL). Five days beforehand, the decision-makers receive a decision paper. But:

  • key messages were lost in technical explanations and caveats
  • the papers were often 20–30 pages – too long to be read
  • the recommendations weren't tailored to the leaders' needs
  • project managers didn't stand their ground when presenting

Our approach

We trained the project managers in four questions:

  • How do we cut a text so the most important point for decision-makers comes first?
  • How do we use earlier decisions actively in our argument?
  • How do we use data and caveats as part of the argument?
  • How do we answer critical questions persuasively and keep a cool head under pressure?

The result

  • Shorter decision papers focused on what decision-makers need to know
  • More effective stage-gate meetings with fewer attendees
  • Project managers who step up: 'From project manager to project leader'
  • The courage to kill weak projects – and a faster path to market for the strong ones

Presentations and meetings

The collaboration expanded with two English-language courses for VELUX staff: Present with Impact and Lead and Facilitate Effective Meetings. Both started with a self-assessment, a short webinar and pre-reading, followed by two course days with input, exercises, video recording and individual feedback – and written follow-up afterwards.

  • Present with Impact: presentations that engage decision-makers, with clear messages and a credible presence.
  • Lead and Facilitate Effective Meetings: why we meet, meeting roles and credibility, an effective kick-off, facilitation tools, difficult questions and virtual meetings.
  • Embedding: Participants prepared an agenda for a real meeting and scheduled follow-up with a colleague and their manager, so the tools were used after the course.
Hand writing notes with a Rhetorica pen

Get in touch

Let's have a chat – or fill in the contact form.

Please contact us online using the form below. We’ll get in touch as soon as possible and look forward to discussing how we can enhance your communication, rhetorical skills and leadership.